BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//ASEN - ECPv6.11.2.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH X-WR-CALNAME:ASEN X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://asen.ac.uk X-WR-CALDESC:Events for ASEN REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H X-Robots-Tag:noindex X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:UTC BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0000 TZOFFSETTO:+0000 TZNAME:UTC DTSTART:20220101T000000 END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Europe/Paris BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0200 TZNAME:CEST DTSTART:20220327T010000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:CET DTSTART:20221030T010000 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0200 TZNAME:CEST DTSTART:20230326T010000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:CET DTSTART:20231029T010000 END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Europe/Helsinki BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0300 TZNAME:EEST DTSTART:20220327T010000 END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0300 TZOFFSETTO:+0200 TZNAME:EET DTSTART:20221030T010000 END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20240409T180000 DTEND;TZID=UTC:20240409T190000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20231024T194909Z LAST-MODIFIED:20240407T191100Z UID:6053-1712685600-1712689200@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Lars-Erik Cederman: The Anthony D. Smith Lecture 2024 DESCRIPTION:The 2024 Anthony D. Smith Lecture will be given by Lars-Erik Cederman on ‘Nationalism and the Transformation of the State: Border Change\, Historical Legacies and Conflict’ \nThe Lecture is public and open to all\, and will be streamed on Facebook and YouTube. \nAbstract\nWhile it is often assumed that the core debates about nationalism were settled by modernist scholars already in the 1980s\, there are reasons to question this theoretical “consensus\,” especially since it fails to anticipate the nationalist geopolitics that is currently undermining the liberal world order. Contemporary studies of nationalism typically refrain from conceptualizing politics in spatial terms\, while overstating states’ ability to shape national identities irrespective of their ethnic roots\, and generally offering little systematic validation of their theoretical claims. To overcome these limitations\, it is useful to analyze how nationalism transforms the state\, rather than the other way around\, with major consequences for border change and conflict patterns. A recent EU-funded research project uses historical maps covering borders of states and ethnic groups in Europe to show how nationalism caused increasing congruence between state and ethno-national borders\, and how a lack of congruence increases the risk of conflict. This risk is further increased by “restorative” narratives targeting supposedly lost independence and unity. Further research traces the spread of nationalism through modernization processes driven by railroad expansion until the early 20th century. Yet it would be a mistake to conclude that state partition offers the only\, or even the best\, solution to nationality problems. Power sharing appears to pacify at least as well as ethno-nationalist border change. \nAbout Lars-Erik Cederman\nLars-Erik Cederman is professor of international conflict research at ETH Zürich. He is the author of Emergent Actors in World Politics: How States and Nations Develop and Dissolve (Princeton University Press\, 1997)\, and co-author of Inequality\, Grievances and Civil War (with Kristian Gleditsch and Halvard Buhaug; Cambridge University Press\, 2013)\, and Sharing Power\, Securing Peace? Ethnic Inclusion and Civil War (with Simon Hug and Julian Wucherpfennig; Cambridge University Press 2022). He has published many articles in scholarly journals\, such as the American Political Science Review\, American Journal of Political Science\, International Organization\, World Politics\, American Journal of Sociology\, and Science. His main research interests include nationalism\, state formation and conflict processes. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/smith2024/ LOCATION:Teviot Lecture Theatre\, University of Edinburgh ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Gellner24.hz_.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20240409 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20240412 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20231003T144931Z LAST-MODIFIED:20231003T144931Z UID:6025-1712620800-1712879999@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Conference 2024: Nationalism and Memory DESCRIPTION:The ASEN Conference will take place at the University of Edinburgh on the subject of ‘nationalism and memory’ from 9th to 11th April 2024. Full information\, including the call for papers\, is on the conference pages. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/conference-2024-nationalism-and-memory/ ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/WebsiteHeader.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20240327T160000 DTEND;TZID=UTC:20240327T173000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20231130T123030Z LAST-MODIFIED:20240315T111514Z UID:6113-1711555200-1711560600@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Michael Hechter: Status Reversal and its Discontents DESCRIPTION:The University of Edinburgh Department of Sociology\, the University of Edinburgh MSc Nationalism in Global Perspective programme\, and ASEN present a lecture by Michael Hechter\, Arizona State University\, on Status Reversal and its Discontents. \nThe lecture will take place in the Violet Laidlaw Room\, 6th Floor\, Chrystal MacMillan Building\, 15a George Square\, Edinburgh EH8 9LD – check back soon for a link for free tickets. \nWe will also be livestreaming the event on Facebook and YouTube. \nAbout Michael Hechter\nMichael Hechter received both his AB and Ph.D. from Columbia University. He is an elected Fellow of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences\, Foundation Professor of Political Science at Arizona State University and a core faculty member of the Center for the Study of Social Dynamics and Complexity. Hechter has previously taught at the Universities of Washington\, Arizona\, Oxford and Copenhagen. He has been a fellow at the Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavioral Sciences and the Russell Sage Foundation\, and was a visiting professor at the Universities of Bergen and Llubljana. \nHechter is the author of numerous books\, including Internal Colonialism: The Celtic Fringe in British National Development\, 1536-1966 (1975; 1998); Principles of Group Solidarity (1987); Containing Nationalism (2000)\, Alien Rule (2013)\, Rational Choice Sociology (2019)\, and\, with Steven Pfaff\, The Genesis of Rebellion (2020). He is editor/co-editor of The Microfoundations of Macrosociology (1983); Social Institutions: Their Emergence\, Maintenance and Effects (1990); The Origin of Values (1993); Social Norms (2001\, 2005); and Theories of Social Order (2003; 2008). His articles have appeared in the American Sociological Review\, American Journal of Sociology\, Demography\, Journal of Theoretical Politics\, Rationality and Society\, Sociological Theory\, European Sociological Review\, and many other journals. His writings have been translated into Italian\, Japanese\, Hungarian\, Chinese\, Arabic\, French\, Spanish\, Czech and Georgian. \nRead more about Michael on his website. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/hechter/ LOCATION:Violet Laidlaw Room\, 6th Floor\, Chrystal MacMillan Building\, 15a George Square\, Edinburgh\, EH8 9LD\, United Kingdom ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Hechter.hz_.png ORGANIZER;CN="Lisa McCormick":MAILTO:Lisa.McCormick@ed.ac.uk END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20240320T180000 DTEND;TZID=UTC:20240320T193000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20240223T172217Z LAST-MODIFIED:20240313T161209Z UID:6500-1710957600-1710963000@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:The new nationalism in America and beyond DESCRIPTION:The 2024 Nations and Nationalism debate\, supported by LSE IDEAS\, is on ‘The new nationalism in America and beyond: the deep roots of ethnic nationalism in the digital age’ by Robert Schertzer and Eric T. Woods. We will be live on Facebook and YouTube\, with members receiving an invite to join on Zoom. \nOur speakers\, Sophie Duchesne\, Philip Gorski and Cynthia Miller-Idriss join the authors\, Robert Schertzer and Eric Woods\, for a debate on their book which analyses the social media campaigns of Donald Trump\, Marine Le Pen\, and the Brexit campaigners\, showing how today’s new nationalists are cultivating support from white majorities by tapping into their history and culture. \nAcross the West\, there has been a resurgence of ethnic nationalism\, populism\, and anti-immigrant sentiment – a phenomenon that many commentators have called the “new nationalism.” In The New Nationalism in America and Beyond\, Robert Schertzer and Eric Taylor Woods seek to understand why the bastions of liberalism are proving to be fertile ground for a decidedly illiberal ideology. To do so\, they examine the social media campaigns of three of the most successful exemplars of the new nationalism: Donald Trump in the US\, Marine Le Pen in France\, and Brexit in the UK. Schertzer and Woods show how today’s new nationalists are cultivating support from white majorities by drawing from long-standing myths and symbols to construct an image of the nation as an ethnic community. Their cutting-edge and multidisciplinary approach combines elements of political science\, sociology\, history\, and communication and media studies\, to show how leaders today are updating the historical foundations of ethnic nationalism for the digital age. \nMeet the speakers and chair \nSophie Duchesne is a political sociologist at CNRS / Centre Emile Durkheim\, Sciences Po Bordeaux. Her research is in citizenship and individualism\, and national and European identities. She published “Citoyenneté à la Française” (Paris\, Presses de Sciences). \nPhilip S. Gorski (Ph.D. University of California\, Berkeley 1996) is a comparative-historical sociologist with strong interests in theory and methods and in modern and early modern Europe. His empirical work focuses on topics such as state-formation\, nationalism\, revolution\, economic development and secularization with particular attention to the interaction of religion and politics. Other current interests include the philosophy and methodology of the social sciences and the nature and role of rationality in social life. Among his recent publications are “The Disciplinary Revolution: Calvinism and the Growth of State Power in Early Modern Europe” (Chicago\, 2003); “Max Weber’s Economy and Society: A Critical Companio”n (Stanford\, 2004); and “The Poverty of Deductivism: A Constructive Realist Model of Sociological Explanation\,” Sociological Methodology\, 2004. Philip Gorski co-runs the Religion and Politics Colloquium at the Yale MacMillan Center \nCynthia Miller-Idriss is a sociologist and professor in the School of Public Affairs and in the School of Education\, American University and runs the Polarization and Extremism Research & Innovation Lab (PERIL). Dr. Miller-Idriss has testified several times before the U.S. Congress and regularly briefs policy\, security\, education and intelligence agencies in the U.S.\, the United Nations\, and other countries on trends in domestic violent extremism and strategies for prevention and disengagement. She is the author\, co-author\, or co-editor of six academic books\, including her most recent books “Hate in the Homeland: The New Global Far Right” (Princeton University Press\, 2020) and “The Extreme Gone Mainstream: Commercialization and Far Right Youth Culture in Germany” (Princeton University Press\, 2018). She has also published over one hundred peer-reviewed articles\, book chapters\, and essays on nationalism\, extremism\, education\, higher education and internationalization. \nRobert Schertzer is an Associate Professor in the Departments of Political Science at the University of Toronto and UTSC. His research and teaching focus on the intersections of three areas: federalism\, judicial politics\, and ethno-national diversity\, with a tendency to look at Canada from a broadly comparative perspective. He is the author of “The Judicial Role in a Diverse Federation: Lessons from the Supreme Court of Canada” (University of Toronto Press\, 2016) and “The New Nationalism in American and Beyond” (Oxford University Press\, 2022\, with Eric Taylor Woods). His work has been published in Nations and Nationalism\, Ethnic and Racial Studies\, the Canadian Journal of Political Science\, Publius\, and the International Journal of Constitutional Law. He is also the founding co-editor of The State of Nationalism\, an open-access portal for review articles on the study of nationalism. \nEric T. Woods is an Associate Professor in Sociology\, School of Society and Culture at the University of Plymouth.  His research and teaching examines the intersections of politics\, culture\, and media – with a particular focus on how these phenomena relate to nationalism.  His most recent book (co-authored with Dr Robert Schertzer) is entitled\, ‘The New Nationalism in America and Beyond: The Deep Roots of Ethnic Nationalism in the Digital Age‘ (Oxford University Press\, 2022).  He also researched the cultural politics of Britain’s imperial past\, and he has published extensively on Christian-Indigenous relations in Canada\, including the 2016 book\, ‘A Cultural Sociology of Anglican Mission and the Indian Residential Schools in Canada‘ (Palgrave\, 2016). He has also edited several multi-author volumes on these topics\, including on the role of rituals in the forging of nations; the potential for cultural sociology to shed new light on nationalism; and on nationalism and conflict management. Alongside his scholarly publications\, he is keen to contribute to public debates through venues such as The Conversation and LSE Blogs. \nElliott Green is Professor in Development Studies in the Department of International Development at the LSE. He is currently Director of the department’s PhD program and convener of the MSc Course ‘Key Issues in Development Studies’ (DV442). Elliott has three main research areas: 1) ethnic politics and national identity in Africa\, 2) patronage\, clientelism and African development\, and 3) the political demography of modern Africa.  He has conducted fieldwork in Uganda\, Tanzania and Botswana\, and for several years taught a course entitled ‘Poverty and Development’ at the annual LSE-University of Cape Town Summer School. His research has published in a variety of academic journals\, including the British Journal of Political Science\, Comparative Politics\, Economic Development and Cultural Change\, International Studies Quarterly\, Journal of Modern African Studies\, Studies in Comparative International Development and World Development\, among others.  He currently sits on the editorial boards of the Journal of Development Studies\, Nations and Nationalism and Regional and Federal Studies\, and is a series editor for the book series “Politics and Development in Contemporary Africa” published by the International Africa Institute.  Outside academia he has briefed the British High Commissioner to Uganda twice (in 2008 and 2010) and regularly writes blog entries for a variety of websites. \nMore information about the event \nThe book can be purchased in physical format via online bookshops such as Book depository: New-Nationalism-America-Beyond. \nThis event is hosted by LSE IDEAS and Nations and Nationalism \nEvent hashtag: #LSENewNationalism \nLSE IDEAS (@lseideas) is LSE’s foreign policy think tank. Through sustained engagement with policymakers and opinion-formers\, IDEAS provides a forum that informs policy debate and connects academic research with the practice of diplomacy and strategy. \nNations and Nationalism (@nationalism) is published on behalf of the Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism (ASEN) in partnership with LSE IDEAS. The journal is published quarterly by Wiley. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/nn24/ ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/newnatm.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20240228T180000 DTEND;TZID=UTC:20240228T193000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20240118T115951Z LAST-MODIFIED:20240118T164821Z UID:6362-1709143200-1709148600@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:The Army\, the Nation\, Nuclear Annihilation DESCRIPTION:The Anthony D. Smith Fellowship Seminar is given by the 2023 Fellow\, Jack Matlack\, on ‘The Army\, the Nation\, Nuclear Annihilation: Constructing ‘Western’ identity in German-American NATO training exercises of the Cold War’. Join us in person in room PAN9.05 at the London School of Economics\, or join us on Facebook or YouTube. Members will receive a link to join on Zoom. \nAbstract\nBeginning in the Cold War\, joint training exercises between the German and US armies involved tens of thousands of soldiers\, colliding in imaginative play of plausible WW3 scenarios on the open fields and farms of West Germany. Proceeding from the reports and recollections of the two officer corps\, I contend that ‘Western’ identity in the military context of NATO exercises was not principally the product of Christian conviviality\, shared democratic ethos (Winkler\, 2007)\, or civilisational public rhetoric (Jackson\, 2006). Rather\, I call attention to precise military tactics and operational assumptions employed by both armies to construct mock war. By interrogating the underlying logic of training exercises\, I argue that the army as the ‘people in arms’ (Moran and Waldron\, 2003) embodied the German and American nations through their (re)enactment of World War 3. When the US Army trained in defending Germany\, the American nation incrementally embraced the identity of the preponderant superpower (Bavaj and Steber\, 2015). Conversely\, mock war  compelled Germans\, for the first time in the 20th century\, to surrender national notions of self reliance. Both nations adopted the standpoint of shared security and the ‘coupling of fates’ as an essential pillar of the Atlantic pact. Through the recurring rehearsal of exercises\, ‘Western’ identity emerges in this context as synthetic\, ultimately channeled through lenses of German and American national identity. \nAbout Jack\nJon-Wyatt ‘Jack’ Matlack is a PhD student at the GSOSES and a doctoral researcher at the Leibniz ScienceCampus at the University of Regensburg. He received the 2023 Anthony D. Smith Visiting Fellowship at LSE IDEAS for his research proposal\, “Maneuvering Westward”\, concerning training exercises of the US Army and German Army in the Cold War. \nFor more information about the Anthony D. Smith Visiting Fellowship\, please visit asen.ac.uk/smith. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/matlack/ LOCATION:PAN9.05\, Pankhurst House\, LSE\, 1 Clement's Inn\, London\, WC2A 2AZ\, United Kingdom ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Matlack.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20240205T180000 DTEND;TZID=UTC:20240205T193000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20240118T123519Z LAST-MODIFIED:20240129T080426Z UID:6365-1707156000-1707161400@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:The Greek Revolution in the Age of Revolution DESCRIPTION:This event is free and open to all\, but pre-registration is required. Please email us to register. \nJoin Paschalis Kitromilides\, John Hutchinson\, and Athena Leoussi to discuss Paschalis’s book\, The Greek Revolution in the Age of Revolutions (1776-1848). The event takes places on 5th February from 1800 at the Graham Wallas Room\, LSE\, and will be streamed live on Facebook and YouTube. \nAbout the book\nThis volume aims to demonstrate the significance of the Greek liberation struggle to international history\, and to highlight how it was a turning point that signalled the revival of revolution in Europe after the defeat of the French Revolution in 1815. It argues that the sacrifices of rebellious Greeks paved the way for other resistance movements in European politics\, culminating in the ‘spring of European peoples’ in 1848. Richly researched and innovative in approach\, this volume also considers the diplomatic and transnational aspects of the insurrection\, and examines hitherto unexplored dimensions of revolutionary change in the Greek world. The Greek Revolution in the Age of Revolutions (1776-1848) is published by Routledge. \nAbout the speakers\nPaschalis Kitromilides is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Athens and a member of the Academy of Athens\, where he holds the chair of the History of Political Thought. He has held visiting appointments at Harvard and Brandeis Universities\, University of Cambridge\, University of Oxford\, the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales\, and the European University Institute. The author of more than fifty books and two hundred and sixty articles\, his works have been published in Russian\, Romanian\, Serbian\, and Bulgarian as well as English and Greek.\n\nAthena Leoussi is Associate Professor in the Department of Languages and Cultures at the University of Reading and a Visiting Senior Fellow in the Government Department at the LSE. She is a founder of the Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism and a founding editor of Nations and Nationalism. Her research interests include the history\, theories and problems of nationalism and national identity; the comparative study of the peoples of Europe\, including their political and cultural histories and contacts; the representation of national identity in art; race\, anti-semitism and national identity in 19th Century Europe; and the role of the classical tradition in the making of modern national identities. She organised\, together with Ian Jenkins\, the British Museum exhibition\, ‘Defining Beauty: The Body in Ancient Greek Art’.\n\nJohn Hutchinson is Reader in Nationalism at the LSE. He has authored and edited eleven books in the field of Nationalism\, including The Dynamics of Cultural Nationalism (1987)\, Modern Nationalism (1994) and Nations as Zones of Conflict (2005) and Nationalism and War (2017)\, which was nominated for the ENMISA book prize and the Hedley Bull Book Prize in International Relations. He is currently Vice-President of the Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism and Co-Editor-in Chief of Nations and Nationalism. In addition\, he sits on the advisory boards of the Institute for the Advancement of the Social Sciences\, Boston University\, and of the Study Platform on Interlocking Nationalisms\, University of Amsterdam. He is working on a book\, provisionally entitled ‘The Herderian Explosion’.\n  URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/greekrev/ LOCATION:Graham Wallas Room LSE\, LSE\, Houghton Street\, London\, WC2A 2AE\, United Kingdom ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Greek-revolution.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20240110T160000 DTEND;TZID=UTC:20240110T180000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20231121T113927Z LAST-MODIFIED:20240110T150708Z UID:6080-1704902400-1704909600@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Defensive Nationalism: explaining the rise of populism and fascism in the 21st century DESCRIPTION:Daphne Halikiopoulou sits down with Beth Rabinowitz to discuss her new book\, Defensive Nationalism: explaining the rise of populism and fascism in the 21st century\, published with Oxford University Press. As ever\, we’ll be live on Facebook and YouTube\, with members receiving an invite to join on Zoom. \nHandouts\nFlow Chart | Table 1 \nAbout Defensive Nationalism\nWhy have atavistic political ideologies taken hold in the most technologically advanced societies? Defensive Nationalism argues that the irrationalism and hatred that marked the early 20th is recurring in the 21st centuries\, and for the same reasons. Combining Karl Polanyi’s concept of the “double movement” with Joseph Schumpeter’s theory of innovation\, the book traces how the explosive politics of both eras stem from the very technological changes that brought humankind to its highest levels of sophistication. In the mid-19th century\, it was railroads\, steam ships\, automated printing presses\, and telegraphy; in the mid-20th century\, turbo jets\, container ships\, satellites\, and computers. These magical modern innovations seemed to hold the promise of global peace and prosperity. But the mid-century liberal trust in international cooperation was quickly eclipsed by something much darker. The new economies of speed and scale created by the Industrial and Digital Revolutions dislodged the moorings of societies. Countries were made vulnerable to global economic crises\, existing systems of production were uprooted\, mass migrations accelerated\, and uniquely modern forms of mass media threatened the social and political order. These same changes also produced never-before-seen modes of international terrorism—anarchist bombings and assassinations in the late-eighteen hundreds\, and Islamist suicide bombings and beheadings in the late-nineteen hundreds. Political actors were able to capitalize on the growing disorientation and fear. Nations began to turn inward as left-wing populist and right-wing proto-fascist movements took hold across the United States and Europe. An era of “defensive nationalism” had commenced. \nAbout Beth Rabinowitz\nBeth is Associate Professor of Political Science at Rutgers. Her research interests cross a number of areas\, including political institutions\, political leadership\, comparative political economy\, nationalism and ethnic conflict\, military institutionalization\, decentralization\, and state building. \nA diverse set of experiences have shaped her approach to research. In the early 1990s I backpacked around Africa for sixteen months. She was most affected by my experiences in Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of Congo)\, where she spent three months in the interior and witnessed some of the effects of a failed State. She saw highways that had decayed into mud traps\, banks with no currency\, and an economy so decimated that urban workers were forced to ‘return’ to the bush to grow crops to sell in Kinshasa with no knowledge of how to live do so. She found myself asking: How could a State just crumble away? She wanted to understand how to place what I had seen: what was ‘African\,’ what was ‘colonial heritage\,’ and what was ‘neo-imperialism.’ When she began graduate studies at the University of Chicago\, she found myself drawn to all courses on Africa. \nHer extensive travels and exposure to different disciplines (with my undergraduate studies in philosophy and my interdisciplinary Masters studies) solidified my conviction that the evolution of political systems must be understood in terms of the cultural and institutional contexts in which they develop. However\, as my knowledge of African politics evolved\, I came to see that institutional analyses were not effectively accounting for different political outcomes in the region. I have since tried to develop an approach that draws upon both historical institutionalism as well as analyses of leadership and agency. \nAbout Daphne Halikiopoulou\nDaphne Halikiopoulou is Chair in Comparative Politics at the University of York\, having previously been Professor of Comparative Politics at the University of Reading. She gained her PhD from LSE (2007) where she also worked as a Fellow in Comparative Politics (2009-2012). \nDaphne is interested in party politics and voting behaviour with a focus on the far right\, populism and nationalism in Europe. She is the author of Understanding right-wing populism and what to do about it (with Tim Vlandas)\, The Golden Dawn’s ‘Nationalist Solution’: explaining the rise of the far right in Greece (with Sofia Vasilopoulou) and numerous articles on European far right parties. Her research appears in the European Journal of Political Research\, West European Politics\, Journal of Common Market Studies\, European Political Science Review\, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies\, Government and Opposition\, Environmental Politics and Nations and Nationalism among others. Her article ‘Risks\, Costs and Labour Markets: Explaining Cross-National Patterns of Far-Right Party Success in European Parliament Elections’ (with Tim Vlandas) has been awarded Best Paper from the American Political Science Association (APSA). URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/rabinowitz/ LOCATION:Online ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Defensive.hz_.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20231206T160000 DTEND;TZID=UTC:20231206T170000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20231003T154037Z LAST-MODIFIED:20231009T213321Z UID:6027-1701878400-1701882000@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Eviane Leidig | The women of the far right: social media influencers and online radicalisation DESCRIPTION:We sit down with Dr Eviane Leidig\, Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellow at Tilburg University\, to discuss her new book\, The women of the far right: social media influencers and online radicalisation. Join us live on Facebook and YouTube; members will receive an invitation to join on Zoom. \nAbout The Women of the Far Right\nEviane Leidig offers an in-depth look into the world of far-right women influencers\, exploring the digital lives they cultivate as they seek new recruits for white nationalism. Going beyond stereotypes of the typical male white supremacist\, she uncovers how young\, attractive women are playing key roles as propagandists\, organizers\, fundraisers\, and entrepreneurs. Leidig argues that far-right women are marketing themselves as authentic and accessible in order to reach new followers and spread a hateful ideology. This insidious—and highly gendered—strategy takes advantage of the structure of social media platforms\, where far-right women influencers’ content is shared with and promoted to mainstream audiences. Providing much-needed expertise on gender and the far right\, this timely and accessible book also details online and offline approaches to countering extremism. The Women of the Far Right is published by Columbia University Press. \nAbout Eviane Leidig\nEviane Leidig is a Marie Skłodowska-Curie postdoctoral fellow at Tilburg University. She is affiliated with the Center for Research on Extremism at the University of Oslo\, the Global Network on Extremism and Technology in London\, and the International Centre for Counter-Terrorism in The Hague. She has been featured by The Independent\, Al Jazeera\, BBC\, Australia Broadcasting Corporation\, and Bellingcat\, among others. \nRead more about Eviane at her website or follow her on Twitter. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/leidig/ ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Leidig.hz_.FB_-1.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20231129T163000 DTEND;TZID=UTC:20231129T180000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20231121T104320Z LAST-MODIFIED:20231127T161528Z UID:6077-1701275400-1701280800@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Historical Memory in Greece DESCRIPTION:Join us on 29th November as we sit down to discuss Christina Koulouri’s new book\, Historical Memory in Greece 1821-1930\, with the author herself\, Maria Kaliambou\, Rainer Liedtke\, and Athena Leoussi. We’ll be live on YouTube and Facebook; members will receive an invitation to join the Zoom call. \nAbout Historical Memory in Greece\nHistorical Memory in Greece presents a social and cultural history of collective memory in modern Greece during the first century of state independence\, contributing to the debate over the relationship between memory and identity. We’ll be live on YouTube and Facebook; members will receive an email to join the Zoom call. \nIt discusses how modern Greek society commemorated its distant and recent pasts\, both real and imagined\, namely antiquity\, Byzantium\, the Greek Revolution and the Asia Minor Catastrophe; how cultural memory was shaped by the various war experiences (victory\, defeat\, mass death and mourning\, refugeedom); and how memory politics became arenas of social and political strife. Historical painting\, monuments\, historical pageantry\, tableaux vivants\, national anniversaries\, performances of ancient drama and revivals of ancient games are analyzed as instances where the past was visualized\, represented\, performed and “consumed”. \nAn explosion in public history has taken place over the last decades around the world\, with a veritable flood of commemorations\, anniversaries and “memory wars”. As more and more social groups claim the “right to remember”\, public discourse and polemics have arisen at the same time that traumatic memory has become a field of international academic research. In the arena of public history\, historical memory is being constructed through the sentimental\, irrational reception of mythological narratives told through images. \nHistorical Memory in Greece is published by Routledge. \nAbout Christina Koulouri\nChristina Koulouri is Professor in Modern and Contemporary History and Rector of Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences (Athens\, Greece). From 2013-2017 she was the Dean of the School of Political Sciences\, Panteion University. She studied at the University of Athens (Department of History and Archaeology)\, the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales and Paris I – Panthéon – Sorbonne where she also received her PhD. She was Visiting Research Fellow at Université de Paris I-Panthéon-Sorbonne (2010)\, Princeton University (2017) and the University of Regensburg (2019). Awarded with the Nikos Svoronos Prize (1993)\, the Delphi Prize (2012)\, and the Vikelas Plaque (2018). Author of several books and articles on the teaching of history\, the history of historiography\, national identity\, memory\, public history\, and the history of sports and the Olympic Games. Her last book (2020) received the National Essay Prize in Greece. \nAbout Maria Kaliambou\nMaria Kaliambou is Senior Lector at the Hellenic Studies Program at Yale University. She earned her B.A. in History and Archaeology at the University of Thessaloniki\, Greece\, and her Ph.D. in European Ethnology/Folklore Studies at the University of Munich\, Germany. She held post-doctoral positions at the University Charles-de-Gaulle Lille 3 and at Princeton University. In 2006\, her dissertation received the Lutz Röhrich Prize in Germany as the best dissertation in oral literature\, and in 2011 the European Commission elected her the Erasmus Student Ambassador of Greece. Her research focuses on the dialogue between folklore and book history\, particularly in the diaspora. She is also interested in foreign language pedagogy\, especially the teaching of Modern Greek. She publishes in Greek\, German and English. In 2006 she published her first monograph with the title Home – Faith – Family: Transmission of Values in Greek Popular Booklets of Tales (1870-1970) (in German). In 2015 she published The Routledge Modern Greek Reader\, Greek Folktales for Learning Modern Greek\, Routledge\, an anthology of Greek folktales for the foreign language classroom. In 2023 her edited volume “The Greek Revolution and the Greek Diaspora in the United States” was published both in English (Routledge) and in Greek (Asini). She is currently working on her next monograph\, tentatively titled “The Book Culture of Greek Americans”. \nAbout Rainer Liedtke\nRainer Liedtke is Professor of European History of the 19th and 20th Centuries at Regensburg. Since October 2014\, holder of a W3 professorship in European History of the 19th and 20th Centuries at Universität Regensburg. 2013-2014 research associate at the Institute of History of TU Darmstadt. 2013 interim professor (representative of Prof. Dr. med. Jens-Ivo Engels) at the Institute of History of TU Darmstadt. 2009-2013 visiting professor and research assistant at the Institute of History of the TU Darmstadt and associate professor at the Historical Institute of the Justus-Liebig-University-Gießen. 2006-2009 Research associate and associate professor at the Historical Institute of the Justus-Liebig-Universität-Gießen\, DFG project: “Zivilgesellschaft und familiäre Regulationsmechanismen: Die Großstadtwerdung Athens im 20. Jahrhundert als Testfall für das Konzept der ‘europäischen Stadt”. 2004-2006 interim assistant professor at the Department of History of Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel (Chair Prof. Dr. Christoph Cornelißen) and private lecturer at the Historical Institute of Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen. 2004 habilitation in modern and recent history at the Justus Liebig Universität Gießen on “Kommunikationswege und Informationstransfer im europäischen Privatbankwesen des 19. Jahrhunderts”. 1991-95 doctoral thesis in modern history at St. Antony’s College\, Oxford University: “Jewish Welfare in Hamburg and Manchester\, 1850-1914”. \nAbout Athena Leoussi (chair)\nAthena Leoussi is a founder of ASEN and currently a member of the steering committee\, having held various other roles in ASEN and with Nations and Nationalism\, of which she is a Founder Editor. Her teaching and research interests include the history\, theories and problems of nationalism and national identity; the comparative study of the peoples of Europe\, including their political and cultural histories and contacts; the representation of national identity in art; race\, anti-semitism and national identity in 19th Century Europe; and the role of the classical tradition in the making of modern national identities. As a result of her research interest in in the revival of the classical Greek body in modern Europe\, she organised\, together with Ian Jenkins\, the British Museum exhibition\, ‘Defining Beauty: The Body in Ancient Greek Art’. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/greece/ LOCATION:Online ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Greece.hz_-2.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20231107T161500 DTEND;TZID=UTC:20231107T173000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20230921T155422Z LAST-MODIFIED:20231003T150312Z UID:6014-1699373700-1699378200@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Harris Mylonas and Maya Tudor | Varieties of Nationalism DESCRIPTION:We sit down with Harris Mylonas and Maya Tudor to discuss their new book\, Varieties of Nationalism. Join us live on Facebook and YouTube; members will receive an invitation to join on Zoom. \nAbout Varieties of Nationalism\nNationalism has long been a normatively and empirically contested concept\, associated with democratic revolutions and public goods provision\, but also with xenophobia\, genocide\, and wars. Moving beyond facile distinctions between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ nationalisms\, the authors argue that nationalism is an empirically variegated ideology. Definitional disagreements\, Eurocentric conceptualizations\, and linear associations between ethnicity and nationalism have hampered our ability to synthesize insights. This Element proposes that nationalism can be broken down productively into parts based on three key questions: (1) Does a nation exist? (2) How do national narratives vary? (3) When do national narratives matter? The answers to these questions generate five dimensions along which nationalism varies: elite fragmentation and popular fragmentation of national communities; ascriptiveness and thickness of national narratives; and salience of national identities. \nAbout Harris\nHarris Mylonas is Associate Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at the Elliott School of International Affairs\, George Washington University. His work contributes to the understanding of states’ management of diversity that may originate from national minorities\, immigrants\, diasporas\, or refugees. He is particularly interested in the role of decision makers’ perceptions about foreign involvement in their domestic affairs and the impact these perceptions have on the planning and implementation of state policies. He is teaching undergraduate courses on Nationalism\, Patriotism\, and European Integration\, and graduate courses on Nation-Building in the Balkans\, Nationalism and Nation-Building\, and Qualitative Research Methods. \nRead more about Harris at GWU or follow him on Twitter. \nAbout Maya\nMaya Tudor is Associate Professor of Government and Public Policy at the Blavatnik School of Government\, University of Oxford. Her research investigates the origins of stable\, democratic and effective states across the developing world\, with a particular emphasis on South Asia. She was educated at Stanford University (BA in Economics) and Princeton University (MPA in Development Studies and PhD in Politics and Public Policy). She has held fellowships at Harvard University’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs\, Oxford University’s Centre for the Study of Inequality and Democracy\, and Stanford University’s Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences. \nRead more about Maya at Oxford or follow her on Twitter. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/varieties/ LOCATION:Online ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/mylonastudor.hz_.FB_-1.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20231011T160000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20231011T173000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20230823T145903Z LAST-MODIFIED:20230825T170937Z UID:5749-1697040000-1697045400@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Denisa Kostovicova | Reconciliation by Stealth: how people talk about war crimes DESCRIPTION:We sit down with Prof. Denisa Kostovicova (LSE) to discuss her new book\, “Reconciliation by Stealth: how people talk about war crimes”. Join us live on Facebook and YouTube; members will receive an invitation to join the Zoom call. \nReconciliation by Stealth is available open access to download from Cornell University Press as an ebook for free. \nAbout Reconciliation by Stealth\nReconciliation by Stealth advances a novel approach to evaluating the effects of transitional justice in postconflict societies. Through her examination of the Balkan conflicts\, Denisa Kostovicova asks what happens when former adversaries discuss legacies of violence and atrocity\, and whether it is possible to do so without further deepening animosities. Reconciliation by Stealth shifts our attention from what people say about war crimes\, to how they deliberate past wrongs. \nBringing together theories of democratic deliberation and peacebuilding\, Kostovicova demonstrates how people from opposing ethnic groups reconcile through reasoned\, respectful\, and empathetic deliberation about a difficult legacy. She finds that expression of ethnic difference plays a role in good-quality deliberation across ethnic lines\, while revealed intraethnic divisions help deliberators expand moral horizons previously narrowed by conflict. In the process\, people forge bonds of solidarity and offset divisive identity politics that bears upon their deliberations. \nReconciliation by Stealth shows us the importance of theoretical and methodological innovation in capturing how transitional justice can promote reconciliation\, and points to the untapped potential of deliberative problem-solving to repair relationships fractured by conflict. \nAbout Denisa\nDenisa Kostovicova is Associate Professor in Global Politics at the European Institute\, London School of Economics\, and is a leading scholar of post-conflict reconstruction with a particular interest in post-conflict justice processes. She is the author of Kosovo: The Politics of Identity and Space (Routledge\, 2005) and Reconciliation by Stealth: How People Talk about War Crimes (Cornell University Press\, forthcoming)\, and co-editor of a number edited volumes\, including Transnationalism in the Balkans (Routledge\, 2008)\, Persistent State Weakness in the Global Age (Ashgate 2009)\, Bottom up Politics: An Agency-Centred Approach to Globalisation (Palgrave Macmillan\, 2011)\, Civil Society and Transitions in the Western Balkans (Palgrave Macmillan\, 2013)\, and Rethinking Reconciliation and Transitional Justice After Conflict (Routlege\, 2018). Her work\, which has also been published in top political science and international relations journals\, has informed policy-making at the EU\, UN and in the UK. Dr Kostovicova’s research was funded by a number of prestigious grants\, including those by the Leverhulme Trust\, MacArthur Foundation and Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC)\, among others. She is currently directing a major research programme funded by the European Research Council (ERC) Consolidator Grant\, “Justice Interactions and Peacebuilding: From Static to Dynamic Discourses Across National\, Ethnic\, Gender and Age Groups.” She has a PhD from the University of Cambridge. Prior to joining LSE\, she held junior research fellowships at the University of Cambridge and the University of Oxford. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/reconciliation/ LOCATION:Online ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Recon.fb_.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20230907T103000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20230907T163000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20230816T150558Z LAST-MODIFIED:20230905T110906Z UID:5744-1694082600-1694104200@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Symposium on nationalism and irony DESCRIPTION:Jump to: Schedule | Introduction | Abstracts | Biographies \nIn collaboration with Dr Alex Marshall (SHU)\, we are delighted to offer the opportunity to join in the third annual Symposium on Nationalism on Irony. \nPapers to be presented include \n\nDiscursive (re)production of internet-mediated Chinese national identity – Zhiwei Wang\nIrony on the edge: the behaviour of far-right deputies in the State Duma of the Russian Empire (1905-1917) – Dr Anastasia Mitrofanova\nMore quixotic than ever: ironic re-ironisation of national iconography in Zoo’s ‘Panya’ (2022) – Dr Laia Darder & Dr Alex Marshall\n‘Being both’ Scottish and British: irony among Scots in London\n\nPlease click here to register for the symposium on Zoom. \nSchedule\n1030-1100: Arrival and Welcome \n1100-1230: Panel 1: The Trolls\n𐫱 Zhiwei Wang: Discursive (Re)production of Internet-Mediated Chinese National Identity\n𐫱 Chris Cannell ‘Being both’ Scottish and British: Irony among Scots in London \n1230-1330: Lunch \n1330-1500: Panel 2: Regions and Overlaps\n𐫱 Dr. Laia Darder and Dr. Alex Marshall: More Quixotic than Ever: Ironic Re-Ironisation of National Iconography in Zoo’s ‘Panya’ (2022)\n𐫱 Dr. Anastasia Mitrofanova: Irony on the Edge: The Behaviour of Far-Right Deputies in the State Duma of the Russian Empire (1905-17) \n1500-1515: Break \n1515-1630: Round Table Discussion \nIntroduction\nFor the third year in a row\, participants at the Nationalism and Irony Symposium will attempt to interpret the complex\, often insidious interaction between irony and nationalism\, both extreme and mainstream. Research into this intersection seems to be gaining traction\, helping understand both the more serious aspects of humour and how nationalisms navigate their own absurdities and incongruities. \nLess than a decade ago\, irony had become almost a staple of reactionary discourse\, yet this association seems to have weakened as the far-right have gained\, consolidated and at times lost power and influence. Yet also ubiquitous\, innocuous forms of nationalism are shaped and processed using irony\, proud of a particular style of or deftness with irony\, or fought over irony as a battleground. \nPrevious years’ events considered the use of irony to test the water\, and how it “allows room for the possible turning of coats”\, but also serves as a way to distinguish the in-group who get the joke from baffled out-groups. We thought about the uses a captive\, defanged form of subversion can offer to power\, or to stigmatised groups having difficult conversations in public. We thought about how useful an ambiguous level of commitment can be to comfortably navigate directly conflicting beliefs. And we speculated that\, if everyone laughs at the same joke for the different reasons\, irony can hide ideology in an innocuously transmissible form. The first year we ended by asking how Boris Johnson gets away with it\, and successfully manages to be his own parody. The second year\, we wondered when and how this stopped working. \nThis year we have\, among other themes\, Chinese social media\, Scottish identity in London\, the possibility of an entirely ironic national identity\, satires of Spain and tourism in Catalan hip-hop\, and provocations by far-right deputies in the pre-Revolution Russian Duma. \nAbstracts\nChris Cannell\, University of Edinburgh\, ‘Being both’ Scottish and British: Irony among Scots in London\nScottish people who live in London present a distinct case for examining irony and its relationship to nationalism. This paper presents ongoing data analysis of fieldwork among this population\, where semi-structured interviews raised interesting ironical understandings\, and ironic and humorous uses\, of national identity and personal cultural repertoire and resources. \nScots in London present a unique\, and under-researched\, site of inquiry into this topic\, due to their liminal\, “edge”-case status within the multinational United Kingdom. Irony here is used as both a conscious way of navigating London’s massive multiplicity and assumed ‘Englishness’ and\, in what I call the ‘dramatic ironic’ form\, a mostly unconscious\, and yet sociologically analysable from data\, way of separating out the differential\, nested\, and potentially conflictual\, but obviously closely allied\, concepts of being both Scottish and British. Further\, the ironic approach to national identity\, with irony as a fairly fluid concept\, and humour as something necessarily frame-breaking\, shows that identities\, and identifications\, are not fixed or consistent\, but things that are contingent on audience\, and also on moment-to-moment self identifications. A joke for one person may not be meant as a joke for another. And even further\, it is the contention of this paper that this ironic content to national identity actual allows Scots in London to navigate the ambiguities of ‘being both’ – joking about Scottishness at one moment and Britishness the next is a way for Scots to finesse the schismogenetic ‘narcissism of small difference’\, as well as the weight of long history and vicissitudes of contemporary politics\, that exists between these two possible forms of identification. \nThis paper argues that irony is a fundamental aspect of London Scot’s perception of\, and ability to navigate\, the multi-nationality of the United Kingdom. This population has an idiosyncratic place in both UK politics and the social processes of the imperial and post-imperial metropole\, and their position is rendered into global import by the historical and present cultural force of London\, especially as a way of understanding the longue durée and deep archaeology of London’s present multiculturalism\, “superdiversity” and modernity. Scottish Londoner’s use of irony\, both witting and unwitting\, as a way of reinforcing national identity is worthy of examination. \nThe history and present understanding of Scottishness in the capital has to navigate and react to an ‘Englishness’ that is both umbral and quintessential. ‘Englishness’ is a cultural artefact that is\, following McCrone (2002) and Nairn (1981)\, of mostly unspoken and yet immense power. Scots in London have a liminality to their national identity which makes irony a fundamental tool in promoting that identity in the face of what McCrone calls the “minus-one”\, or datum identity\, of (white\, middle class\, and at times\, Anglican) Englishness. The unspoken power of Englishness makes it difficult\, in certain cases\, to wholeheartedly embrace Britishness\, which also becomes a site for ironic engagement. This desire to ‘be both’ in the face of assertive Englishness leads to a ‘dramatic ironic’ identification of certain elements of Britishness with those of Scottishness\, but also at times an obscurification as to which is which\, they being entangled and nested identities. \nThe sharing of a “sense of humour”\, both Scottish and British\, is a key aspect\, as is the use of subtle jokey cultural signs\, mostly\, following Fox and Miller-Idriss (2008)\, in the form of “everyday nationalism” of consumption: Tunnocks cakes\, Buckfast\, jokingly sacral ideas around haggis and\, more seriously\, the ‘correct’ drinking of whisky. What makes this context so fascinating is\, as Fox (2018) points out\, the spatial and political national “edge” at which Scots find themselves – both ‘outside’ the national boundaries of Scotland\, but within the capital of their nominal ‘other’ national identity – Britain. However\, the variety of responses to questions about what Britishness entails\, and whether London is a British city\, were laced with irony\, both jokingly\, and dramatic in the sometime inability to separate out the qualities of Scottish sensibilities and sense of humour from British ones. \nIn short\, the irony used by Scots in London is multifaceted\, in that is sometimes a conscious approach to the promotion and use of a national identity in the face of the sheer scale of multicultural modernity in London\, and a reaction to datum Englishness\, and sometimes as an unconscious\, ‘dramatic ironic’ reaction to the same. \nDr. Laia Darder & Dr. Alex Marshall\, Sheffield Hallam University\, More Quixotic than Ever: Ironic Re-Ironisation of National Iconography in Zoo’s ‘Panya’ (2022)\nValencian hip-hop group Zoo use the 2022 video to ‘Panya’ to criticise the cultural and political dominance of both Spain over Catalan-speaking areas and\, with the blessing of nationalist political forces\, the tourist industry over Spain. Filmed in various tourist locations\, the denunciation is assembled semiotically and linguistically\, in a mixture of Valencian Catalan\, Spanish\, English and English-accented Spanish by the vocalists dressed as Don Quixote and Sancho Panza. This paper will examine the critiques of Spanish nationalism\, tourism and capitalism\, both explicit in the lyrics and implicit in the video. We will pay particular attention to the ironic use of Don Quixote\, a famously satirical figure central to Spain’s literary heritage and national iconography and one of the country’s most recognisable cultural exports\, against a backdrop of conflict between Spanish and Catalan national identities. In doing so it will elaborate and attempt to quantify the spiralling multi-layered and self-referential irony\, and how the comic appropriation\, détournement and anachronistic deployment of Don Quixote reinscribes the self-satire and absurdism often stripped from national symbols. Finally\, we will attempt to situate the relationship of the comic figure to straight-faced nationalism both as a site of conflict and tensions between two strategies\, the one of denial and expulsion\, the other of appropriation and assimilation. \nDr. Anastasia Mitrofanova\, Federal Center for Theoretical and Applied Sociology\, Russian Academy of Sciences – Irony on the Edge: The Behaviour of Far-Right Deputies in the State Duma of the Russian Empire (1905-17)\nThis presentation examines the tactics employed by far-right deputies in the State Duma\, specifically focusing on figures such as Vladimir Purishkevich\, Nikolai Markov the Second\, Sergei Kelepovskii\, and Pavolakii Krushevan. Their behavior was marked by scandalous and extravagant actions.  These deputies often resorted to rough humor and offensive irony in their public speeches\, particularly when discussing topics related to Jews and socialists. Additionally\, they engaged in epatage behavior\, with Markov even adopting the external image of Peter the Great. Some of their satirical gestures were on the edge\, such as Purishkevich once arriving at the Duma with a red flower in his trousers. \nThe far-right deputies did not shy away from intertwining irony with violence\, as seen in the case of mockery duels\, like the ironic duel between Markov and a Jewish deputy\, Osip Pergament. Some authors note instances where the far-right deputies intentionally voted alongside socialists to support revolutionary resolutions that contradicted their own viewpoints. One plausible reason behind this behavior is that they were a minority in the left-liberal Duma and felt compelled to employ such strategies to propagate their position. Another perspective suggests that these far-right monarchists fundamentally opposed parliamentary practices and used their participation in the parliament to underscore its superfluity. \nZhiwei Wang\, University of Edinburgh\, Being Chinese Online – Discursive (Re)production of Internet-Mediated Chinese National Identity\nA further investigation into how Chinese national(ist) discourses are daily (re)shaped online by diverse socio-political actors (especially ordinary users) can contribute to not only deeper understandings of Chinese national sentiments on the Chinese Internet but also richer insights into the socio-technical ecology of the contemporary Chinese digital (and physical) world. I propose an ethnographic methodology\, with Sina Weibo (a Twitter-like microblogging site) and bilibili (a YouTube-like video-streaming platform) as ‘fieldsites’. The data collection method is virtual ethnographic observation on everyday national(ist) discussions on both platforms. Critical discourse analysis is employed to analyse data. From November 2021 to December 2022\, I conducted 36 weeks’ digital ethnographic observations with 36 sets of fieldnotes. For 36 weeks’ observations\, I concentrated much upon textual content created by ordinary users. Based on fieldnotes of the first week’s observations\, I found multifarious national(ist) discourses on Sina Weibo and bilibili\, targeted both at national ‘Others’ and ‘Us’\, both on the historical and real-world dimension\, both aligning with and differing from or even conflicting with official discourses\, both direct national(ist) expressions and articulations of sentiments in the name of presentation of national(ist) attachments but for other purposes. Second\, Sina Weibo and bilibili users have agency in interpreting and deploying concrete national(ist) discourses despite the leading role played by the government and two platforms in deciding on the basic framework of national expressions. Besides\, there are also disputes and even quarrels between users in terms of explanations for concrete components of ‘nation-ness’ and (in)direct dissent to officially defined ‘mainstream’ discourses to some extent\, though often expressed mundanely\, discursively and playfully. Third\, the (re)production process of national(ist) discourses on Sina Weibo and bilibili depends upon not only technical affordances and limitations of the two sites but also\, to a larger degree\, some established socio-political mechanisms and conventions in offline China. \nBiographies\nDr. Laia Darder & Dr. Alex Marshall\nAlex Marshall is a Senior Lecturer in German at Sheffield Hallam University. Following an undergraduate degree in French and German at the University of Edinburgh\, he completed a doctorate at the University of Oxford on early Political Zionist concepts of nationhood. He has also worked for several years in the TEFL industry. His publications include Theodor Herzl: Comedy and Politics Mix for Zeteo journal and a chapter on the early communist and proto-Zionist Moses Hess for the collection Nationalism before the Nation-State: Literary Constructions of Inclusion\, Exclusion\, and Self-Definition (1756–1871). \nDr Anastasia Mitrofanova\nAnastasia V. Mitrofanova (born 1973) is Leading Research Fellow at the Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (since 2019); Professor at the Financial University under the Government of Russia. She received her M.A. (1994) and Ph.D. (1998) from the Department of Philosophy of the Moscow State University\, and her Dr.habilitat degree from the Diplomatic Academy of the Foreign Affairs Ministry of Russia (2005). Mitrofanova’s research interests include: religious politicisation\, fundamentalism\, Orthodox Christianity and politics\, nationalism in postsoviet states\, social movements\, late Soviet and postsoviet society\, memory politics. Main publications: Politizatsiia ‘pravoslavnogo mira’ (Moskva: Nauka\, 2004); The Politicization of Russian Orthodoxy: Actors and Ideas (Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag\, 2005). \nZhiwei Wang \nZhiwei is a third-year PhD student in Sociology at the School of Social and Political Science\, University of Edinburgh. His research interests include nations\, nationalism and national identity; digital media and social media; cyberpunk culture; biopower and biopolitics; digital health; social capital; Marxism; neoliberalism; digital labour; agency and structure; surveillance; deviance; East Asia; and China. The topic of his PhD research is discursive (re)production of Internet-mediated Chinese national identity\, which assesses how Chinese national identity is discursively (re)generated by socio-political actors (especially ordinary users) on China’s Internet. Zhiwei obtained an MA in Digital Media and Society from the University of Sheffield and a Bachelor of Literature in English (International Trade) from Hefei University of Technology. His publication is ‘How the State Builds Collective Identity through the Mass Media? Reading Media\, State and Nation: Political Violence and Collective Identities (in Chinese)’ and ‘Jasper M. Trautsch (ed.)\, Civic Nationalisms in Global Perspective. Routledge\, 2019. viii + 213 pp. £36.99 (ebk)\, £36.99 (pbk)\, £120.00 (hbk)\, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315099002 . His PhD project was awarded the 3rd place of the Management & Social Sciences category of the 11th Doctoral Research Awards (DRA) (UK) organised by the Association of British Turkish Academics (ABTA) on 10th September 2022. \nPlease click here to register for the symposium. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/irony/ LOCATION:Online ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/natmirony.hz_-2.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20230717T180000 DTEND;TZID=UTC:20230717T193000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20230612T101231Z LAST-MODIFIED:20230620T100107Z UID:5692-1689616800-1689622200@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Vinod Goel | Why is Ethnicity Grouping Universal\, Powerful\, and Persistent: Insights from Neurodevelopment DESCRIPTION:Join us at Birkbeck\, University of London\, in the Paul Hirst Seminar Room\, 10 Gower Street\, on July 17th from 1800 for a seminar with Prof Vinod Goel on what ethnicity studies can learn from neurodevelopment. Free and no ticket required. The event will also be livestreamed on Facebook and YouTube. \nAbstract\nEthnicity is among the most powerful of social/political forces. One definition of an ethnic group is “any group who set themselves apart and/or are set apart by others with whom they interact or coexist on the basis of their perceptions of cultural and/or common ancestry” (Jones\, 1997). The various accounts of the phenomenon can be organized into two broad categories of “primordialism” and “constructivism” or “instrumentalism.” The former explains ethnicity as a natural phenomenon grounded in kinship ties and assigned at birth (e.g. Van den Berghe\, 1981; Connor\, 1993; Blanton\, 2015). The latter explains ethnic group formation as a cognitive\, social construction strategy for protecting and projecting economic and political interests (e.g. Cohen\, 1974; Anderson\, 1991). Social Identity Theory is an influential variation on the latter (Hale\, 2004). The two accounts need not be mutually exclusive (Fearon\, 1999).  The critical difference between these theories is their position on the question of the ease or difficulty with which ethnic identities can be changed\, once established. On the primordial accounts it is difficult; on the constructivist accounts much easier. \nWhatever their merits\, these theories struggle to explain the special status of ethnicity in human affairs and convincingly answer the following four questions: (1) What is special about the formation of ethnic groups? (2) Why is it so difficult to change ethnic identities\, once formed? (3) Why do ethnic motives have such emotive power? (4) Why is there an asymmetry in the wielding of ethnicity as a political tool (i.e. why is it easier to provoke interethnic violence versus attenuating it)? I will propose a very different account of ethnic grouping in terms of neural maturation trajectories and the tethered nature of minds that can provide substantive answers to these questions. Time permitting\, I will also discuss the implications of this model for multiethnic societies and nationalism. \nAbout Vinod Goel\nVinod Goel is Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience at York University\, Toronto\, Canada. His research interests include the cognitive\, computational\, and neural basis of rational decision-making and emotional processing in humans\, and more recently\, the interaction between the two. His primary methodologies include brain imaging (fMRI & PET)\, patient studies\, and computational modelling. \nHis most recent book is Reason and Less\, published by MIT. \nRead more about Prof. Goel at York U. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/vinodgoel/ LOCATION:Paul Hirst Seminar Room\, Birkbeck\, 10 Gower Street\, 10 Gower Street\, London\, WC1E 6HE\, United Kingdom ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/GoelPoster-1.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20230612 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20230618 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20221209T100645Z LAST-MODIFIED:20221209T100645Z UID:5203-1686528000-1687046399@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:ASEN Summer School 2023 DESCRIPTION:The 2023 ASEN Conference will be on Nationalism and Multiculturalism and will be held at the University of Zadar. Please see the summer school pages for full information. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/asen-summer-school-2023/ END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20230503T180000 DTEND;TZID=UTC:20230503T193000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20230315T164526Z LAST-MODIFIED:20230426T100156Z UID:5588-1683136800-1683142200@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:POSTPONED: N&N Debate: The New Nationalism in America and Beyond DESCRIPTION:Regrettably\, this event has been postponed as one of the panellists cannot attend due to family reasons. We will advertise the rescheduled date as soon as we have it. \nJoin us at the London School of Economics for the 2023 Nations and Nationalism debate on “The New Nationalism in America and Beyond: The Deep Roots of Ethnic Nationalism in the Digital Age” with the authors\, Robert Schertzer and Eric Taylor Woods\, joined by Sophie Duchesne and Cynthia Miller-Idriss. The debate will be held at the London School of Economics and will be livestreamed on Facebook and YouTube. \nFor more information on the event and the speakers\, please visit the LSE Ideas event page. To register for the event\, please email asen@asen.ac.uk. \nAcross the West\, there has been a resurgence of ethnic nationalism\, populism\, and anti-immigrant sentiment – a phenomenon that many commentators have called the “new nationalism.” In The New Nationalism in America and Beyond\, Robert Schertzer and Eric Taylor Woods seek to understand why the bastions of liberalism are proving to be fertile ground for a decidedly illiberal ideology. To do so\, they examine the social media campaigns of three of the most successful exemplars of the new nationalism: Donald Trump in the US\, Marine Le Pen in France\, and Brexit in the UK. Schertzer and Woods show how today’s new nationalists are cultivating support from white majorities by drawing from long-standing myths and symbols to construct an image of the nation as an ethnic community. Their cutting-edge and multidisciplinary approach combines elements of political science\, sociology\, history\, and communication and media studies\, to show how leaders today are updating the historical foundations of ethnic nationalism for the digital age. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/nandn23/ LOCATION:Sumeet Valrani Theatre\, London School of Economics\, Centre Building\, Houghton Street\, London\, London\, WC2A 2AE\, United Kingdom ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/333595711_509727784699862_6045318024282420957_n.jpg END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20230403 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20230406 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20221209T100512Z LAST-MODIFIED:20221209T100512Z UID:5202-1680480000-1680739199@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:ASEN Conference 2023: Nationalism and Multiculturalism DESCRIPTION:The 2023 ASEN Conference will be on Nationalism and Multiculturalism and will be held at the University of Loughborough. Please see the conference pages for full information. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/asen-conference-2023-nationalism-and-multiculturalism/ ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/New-artwork.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20230402T163000 DTEND;TZID=UTC:20230402T173000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20230123T122350Z LAST-MODIFIED:20230331T130301Z UID:5378-1680453000-1680456600@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Ernest Gellner Lecture 2023: Ukraine at War with Andrew Wilson DESCRIPTION:The Ernest Gellner Lecture 2023 will be given by Andrew Wilson on Ukraine at War: Baseline Identity and Social Construction at the University of Loughborough as the traditional ‘eve of conference’ event. \nIt will also be livestreamed on Facebook and YouTube. \n  \n  URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/gellner2023/ LOCATION:Stewart Mason Building\, Loughborough University ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/GellnerLecture.hz_.Banksy.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20230320T170000 DTEND;TZID=UTC:20230320T180000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20230313T213919Z LAST-MODIFIED:20230313T214946Z UID:5580-1679331600-1679335200@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Book discussion: Global Nationalism with Pablo De Orellana and Nicholas Michelsen DESCRIPTION:We sit down with Pablo de Orellana and Nicholas Michelsen to discuss their new edited volume\, Global Nationalism: Ideas\, Movements And Dynamics In The Twenty-first Century. We’ll be live on Facebook and YouTube\, and members will receive an invite to join on Zoom. \nAbout Global Nationalism \nThe twenty-first century is witnessing a truly transnational revival of a very old set of ideas. Despite romantic attachments to old symbols\, these late modern nationalism movements are not simply replicas of the previous two waves of nationalism in the 1860s and 1920s. Nor is it true that today’s nationalism movements want simply to return to the past and effect a nationalist 1930s-style retrenchment. From Putin’s macho revivalism\, through to Trump’s shocking victory and Xi’s strongman regionalism\, nationalists engage with the economic context of our time and address issues born of globalization. Crucially\, in their vision for international relations they seek the destruction of key international norms in a drive to restore a vision of sovereignty predicated on a survivalist understanding of state power. Global Nationalism\, edited and framed by Pablo de Orellana and Nicholas Michelsen\, brings together the latest research by up-and-coming early career researchers and scholars. Beginning with a succinct history and typology of contemporary nationalism and its predecessors\, this book offers analysis of several cases of contemporary nationalism\, examining how specific movements define identity\, address grievances and propose identity-based solutions. Key themes and lessons emerge from the study of a variety of cases\, from the very ideas animating nationalist thought\, to their expression in a wide variety of nationalist movements around the world. The reflections on the ecosystem of nationalist ideas and movements offered in this volume are a vital starting point in the study of contemporary nationalism as a global twenty-first century phenomenon. Global Nationalism is published by World Scientific \nAbout the editors \nPablo de Orellana is Lecturer in International Relations\, Department of War Studies at King’s College\, London. He is an inter-disciplinary scholar-working on diplomacy\, nationalism and the relationship between art and conflict. He graduated in French and Italian at Oxford before a Master’s in International Relations at Cambridge\, leading to a PhD at King’s College London\, completed in December 2015. \nHis research on how diplomatic communication constitutes the representations upon which policy is made threads together his passion for political philosophy\, literary analysis\, history and aesthetics. In this research\, theoretical approaches are put to work analysing archival research determining how policy comes to identify the political identity of peoples and their contexts. \nRead more about Pablo at KCL or follow Pablo on Twitter. \nNicholas Michelsen is Reader in International Relations at King’s College\, London. He was awarded his undergraduate degree in International Relations and Philosophy by the University of Sussex\, and holds an MA in International Conflict Studies and an MRes in War Studies from King’s College London. He wrote his doctoral thesis in the Department of War Studies\, King’s College London. \nRead more about Nicholas at KCL. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/globalnationalism/ LOCATION:Online ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/globalnationalism.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20221213T170000 DTEND;TZID=UTC:20221213T183000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20221025T151151Z LAST-MODIFIED:20221025T151540Z UID:4969-1670950800-1670956200@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:The Left(s) and Nationalism(s) in contemporary Western Europe DESCRIPTION:The relationship between the left and nationalism is an ongoing field of discussion and debate. We join the authors of the recent Nations and Nationalism themed section\, ‘The Left(s) and Nationalism(s) in contemporary Western Europe’ to look at nationalism and the left in Spain\, Italy\, the UK\, in green politics\, and more. As ever\, we’ll be live on Facebook and YouTube\, with members being invited to join us on Zoom. \nThe articles\nIntroduction – Emmanuel Dalle Mulle & Tudi Kernalegenn \nThe nation of the people: An analysis of Podemos and Five Star Movement’s discourse on the nation – Jacopo Custodi and Enrico Padoan \nGreens and the nation: Is small beautiful? – Tudi Kernalegenn \nUniversalism within: The tension between universalism and community in progressive ideology – Emmanuel Dalle Mulle and Ivan Serrano \n“We’re socialists not nationalists”: British labour and the national question(s) – Coree Brown Swan \n  URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/leftnationalism/ LOCATION:Online ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/leftnat.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20221125T173000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20221125T190000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20221017T182506Z LAST-MODIFIED:20221116T133400Z UID:4958-1669397400-1669402800@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:CANCELLED | Report launch + reception: Right-Wing Populism And What To Do About It DESCRIPTION:Due to industrial action by UCU\, this event has been postponed. We hope to reschedule it for Spring 2023. Please click here for more information. \n \n \n \n We are delighted to host an event with the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung on their new report\, Understanding Right-Wing Populism And What To Do About It\, with the reports’ authors\, Daphne Halikiopoulou and Tim Vlandas\, with discussants Diane Bolet\, and Sofia Vasilopoulou\, with Elliott Green chairing. \nThe event will take place in the Old Theatre at the London School of Economics\, followed by a reception in the Senior Common Room. If you can’t make it in person\, we will also be live streaming on Facebook and YouTube. \nThere is no charge for the event\, although it is ticketed. \nAbout the report\nThe report presents a combination of empirical and qualitative analysis of right-wing populist parties (RWPPs) in 17 European countries. \nIn order to better understand the success of European right-wing populist parties (RWPPs) the report looks at the Three Ps: \n\nThe First P: People: Why do individual people vote for RWPPs? (Demand)\nThe Second P: Parties: What makes certain RWP parties more successful than others? (Supply)\nThe Third P: Policies: What is the role of social policies in facilitating and/or moderating RWPP success?\n\nThe report can be downloaded for free from the FES. \nAbout the speakers\nProfessor Daphne Halikiopoulou is Professor of Comparative Politics at the University of Reading. She has written extensively on nationalism and the cultural and economic determinants of far-right party support. Her research appears in the European Journal of Political Research\, Journal of Common Market Studies\, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies\, Government and Opposition\, European Political Science Review\, and Nations and Nationalism among others. From 2023\, she will be Chair of Comparative Politics at the University of York. \nShe is joint Editor-in-Chief of the journal Nations and Nationalism (with John Breuilly\, John Hutchinson and Eric Kaufmann) and co-editor (with Daniel Stockemer) of the Springer book series in Electoral Politics. \nFind out more about Daphne at the University of Reading or follow her on Twitter. \nDr Tim Vlandas is Associate Professor in the Department of Social Policy and Fellow in St Antony’s College\, both at the University of Oxford. He holds a PhD in Political Economy from the London School of Economics. His main area of expertise is comparative political economy\, with a particular interest in the relationship between electoral politics\, public policies and socio-economic outcomes. His research has been published in over 25 academic journals and has received awards from the American Political Science Association and the European Network for Social Policy Analysis. He has recently co-authored a book entitled “Foreign States in Domestic Markets: Sovereign Wealth Funds and the West”\, published by Oxford University Press. His research has been cited by the UK House of Commons\, World Bank\, International Labour Organisation\, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development\, European Commission\, and the United Nations. \nFind out more about Tim on his website or follow him on Twitter. \nDr Diane Bolet is a political scientist and comparativist\, specialised in voting behaviour\, public opinion and far-right politics in Europe and is currently a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Zürich. \nShe holds a PhD in Political Science from the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) looking at how local context shapes voting preferences for the radical right in European countries. Her thesis won an honourable mention for the Ernst B. Haas Dissertation Prize for the best dissertation on European Politics from the European Politics and Society section of APSA. She previously earned a distinction Dual MSc degree in European Politics from Sciences Po\, Paris and LSE and a Higher Distinction BA in International Politics from King’s College\, London. \nFind out more about Diane on her website or follow her on Twitter. \n \nProfessor Sofia Vasilopoulou is Professor of European Politics at King’s College\, London. Her work examines the causes and consequences of political dissatisfaction among the public and the ways in which this is channelled through party strategies and party competition. Specific themes include Euroscepticism and far right politics. Her research and teaching interests lie in Comparative Politics\, Political Behaviour\, Party Politics and European Union Politics. \nShe is Editor-in-Chief of the European Journal of Political Research and an Honorary Professor at the University of York\, where she worked from 2011 to 2022. \nFind out more about Sofia on her website or follow her on Twitter. \nDr Elliott Green is Associate Professor of Development Studies in the Department of International Development at the LSE\, where he is also director of the PhD programme. His main research areas are ethnic politics and national identity in Africa; patronage\, clientelism and African development; and the political demography of modern Africa. He has conducted fieldwork in Uganda\, Tanzania and Botswana\, and for several years taught a course entitled ‘Poverty and Development’ at the annual LSE-University of Cape Town Summer School. Outside academia he has briefed the British High Commissioner to Uganda twice (in 2008 and 2010) and regularly writes blog entries for a variety of websites. \nFind out more about Elliott at the LSE or follow him on Twitter. \n  URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/populism/ LOCATION:Old Theatre\, LSE\, Houghton Street\, London\, London\, WC2A 2AE\, United Kingdom ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/csm_00025612_populism_5e5281c1c4.jpg END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20221025T173000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20221025T183000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20221013T174126Z LAST-MODIFIED:20221021T090146Z UID:4941-1666719000-1666722600@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:The Populism Interviews with Luca Manucci\, Aurelien Mondon\, and Daphne Halikiopoulou DESCRIPTION:We sit down to discuss Luca Manucci’s new book\, The Populism Interviews: A Dialogue with Leading Experts. In this fascinating volume\, Luca talks about populism in all its varied forms with a range of experts \nWe’re delighted that Luca is joining us along with two of the contributors\, Aurelien Mondon and Daphne Halikiopoulou\, to talk about the book and about populism \nThe Populism Interviews is published by Routledge. \nWe will be live on Facebook and YouTube\, and members will receive an invite to join on Zoom. \nAbout the participants\nLuca Manucci is Postdoctoral Researcher at the at the Institute of Social Sciences at the University of Lisbon (ICS-UL)\, Portugal. His previous publications include Populism and Collective Memory: Comparing Fascist Legacies in Western Europe (Routledge\, 2020). \nDaphne Halikiopoulou is Professor of Comparative Politics at the University of Reading and has written extensively on nationalism and the cultural and economic determinants of far-right party support. From January 2023\, she will be Chair in Comparative Politics at the University of York. \nAurelien Mondon is Senior Lecturer in Politics at the University of Bath. He currently works on various project related to liberal and illiberal articulations of racism and right-wing populism\, and their impact on liberal democracies. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/populisminterviews/ LOCATION:Online ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/popint.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20221011T160000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20221011T170000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20220916T204739Z LAST-MODIFIED:20220916T211735Z UID:4921-1665504000-1665507600@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Kin Majorities: Identity and Citizenship in Crimea and Moldova with Eleanor Knott DESCRIPTION:We sit down with Eleanor Knott to discuss her new book\, Kin Majorities: Identity and Citizenship in Crimea and Moldova live on Facebook and YouTube\, with members receiving an invite to join on Zoom. \nAbout Kin Majorities \nIn Moldova\, the number of dual citizens has risen exponentially in the last decades resulting in over 1 million\, or one third of Moldova’s population\, becoming Romanian citizens. Before annexation\, many saw Russia as granting citizenship to–or passportizing–large numbers in Crimea. Why do communities engage with citizenship from an external state? And how does engagement with dual citizenship intersect\, or not\, with identity? Leveraging a bottom-up\, interpretive and comparative approach\, Kin Majorities (McGill University Press\, 2022) analyzes data collected from ordinary people in Crimea and Moldova in 2012 and 2013\, just before Russia’s annexation of Crimea\, to explore the intersections of identity and citizenship in these cases. \nAs the book is quite expensive\, if anyone would like any help getting a copy the author is happy to be contacted at e.k.knott@lse.ac.uk. \nAbout Dr Knott \nEleanor Knott (she/her\, @ellie_knott) is a political scientist and Assistant Professor in Qualitative Methodology in the Department of Methodology\, LSE. Her current research interests include the politics of identity and citizenship (predominantly in post-Soviet space) and qualitative research methods\, primarily ethics of research. She has published in Perspectives on Politics\, Qualitative Research\, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies\, Citizenship Studies and Democratization\, among others. Her first book—Kin Majorities: Identity and Citizenship in Crimea and Moldova—was published with McGill University Press in 2022.  URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/kinmajorities/ LOCATION:Online ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/iraq-1.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20220930T160000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20220930T170000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20220916T200518Z LAST-MODIFIED:20220916T211031Z UID:4919-1664553600-1664557200@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Special report from the field: The women of the Islamic State in Iraq with Susan Schulman DESCRIPTION:We sit down with Susan Schulman\, to discuss her recent Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism article\, ‘Special report from the field: The women of the Islamic State in Iraq‘. \nSusan Schulman is a photo-journalist; visit her website at susanschulman.co.uk or follow her on Twitter @susanschulman23. \nThe event will be streamed live on Facebook and YouTube\, with members receiving an invite to join the Zoom meeting. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/womeniniraq/ LOCATION:Online ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/iraq.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20220929T180000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20220929T200000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20220916T191743Z LAST-MODIFIED:20220916T200706Z UID:4916-1664474400-1664481600@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Prof. Jack Spence OBE - 60 years in international affairs DESCRIPTION:To Professor Jack Spence’s retirement\, Professor Funmi Olonisakin\, Vice-Principal KCL\, the Department of War Studies\, and the African Leadership Centre\, King’s College London\, and ASEN are hosting a drinks and nibbles reception with a few brief contributions from some of those with whom he has worked\, or whom he has mentored and influenced. \nRegistration for this event is required via KCL. \nProfessor Jack Spence OBE has been one of the leading figures in International Relations for several decades. He has been awarded 3 honorary doctorates and 4 honorary fellowships\, one from King’s College London. His work has covered theory and practice\, with focuses on international politics as a field\, diplomacy\, nationalism\, Africa\, war and defence education\, and poetry and literature. Born in South Africa\, he came to Britain for postgraduate study at the LSE. \nHis eminent academic career spanned academic posts at the University of Natal\, University College\, Swansea\, and the University of Leicester\, where he was appointed Professor and Pro-Vice Chancellor. From 1991-1997\, he was Director of Studies at Chatham House — the Royal Institute for International Affairs\, and subsequently\, Academic Advisor at the Royal College of Defence Studies\, where he edited the Seaford House Papers. In 1997\, he joined the Department of War Studies at King’s\, where he is Professor of Diplomacy. \nAmong his many other roles\, he served as Chair of the British International Studies Associ-ation\, President of the African Studies Association\, and Chair of the David Davies Memorial Institute\, as well as Chair of the International Advisory Council of the Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism. In 2003\, he was awarded the OBE for services to military education in the Jubilee Honours. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/jackspence/ LOCATION:KCL Council Room\, K2.29\, King's Building\, Strand Campus\, London\, WC2R 2LS\, United Kingdom ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/webp:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/profjackspence.xeee63d16.webp END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20220628T173000 DTEND;TZID=UTC:20220628T183000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20220622T181056Z LAST-MODIFIED:20220623T160955Z UID:4828-1656437400-1656441000@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Taras Kuzio: Russian Nationalism and the Russian-Ukrainian War DESCRIPTION:Join us for a discussion with Taras Kuzio on his new book\, Russian Nationalism and the Russian-Ukrainian War. \nWe’ll be live on Facebook and YouTube\, and members will receive an invitation to join the Zoom call. \nThis book is the first to provide an in-depth understanding of the 2014 crisis\, Russia’s annexation of Crimea and Europe’s de facto war between Russia and Ukraine. The book provides a historical and contemporary understanding behind President Vladimir Putin Russia’s obsession with Ukraine and why Western opprobrium and sanctions have not deterred Russian military aggression. \nThe volume provides a wealth of detail about the inability of Russia\, from the time of the Tsarist Empire\, throughout the era of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR)\, and since the dissolution of the latter in 1991\, to accept Ukraine as an independent country and Ukrainians as a people distinct and separate from Russians. The book highlights the sources of this lack of acceptance in aspects of Russian national identity. In the Soviet period\, Russians principally identified themselves not with the Russian Soviet Federative Republic\, but rather with the USSR as a whole. Attempts in the 1990s to forge a post-imperial Russian civic identity grounded in the newly independent Russian Federation were unpopular\, and notions of a far larger Russian ‘imagined community’ came to the fore. A post-Soviet integration of Tsarist Russian great power nationalism and White Russian émigré chauvinism had already transformed and hardened Russian denial of the existence of Ukraine and Ukrainians as a people\, even prior to the 2014 crises in Crimea and the Donbas. Bringing an end to both the Russian occupation of Crimea and to the broader Russian–Ukrainian conflict can be expected to meet obstacles not only from the Russian de facto President-for-life\, Vladimir Putin\, but also from how Russia perceives its national identity. \nTaras Kuzio is Adjunct Professor in the Department of Political Science\, National University of Kyiv Mohyla Academy and an Associate Research Fellow at the Henry Jackson Society . URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/kuzio/ ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/taraskuzio.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Helsinki:20220407T140000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Helsinki:20220407T153000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20220324T161356Z LAST-MODIFIED:20220324T171653Z UID:4633-1649340000-1649345400@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Gertjan Willems on 'Nationalism and Film: Towards a New Research Agenda' DESCRIPTION:The final plenary from the joint ASEN-NISE 2022 Conference on Nationalism and Media will be broadcast live on YouTube and Facebook. \nAbstract \nThe majority of research on the relationship between nationalism and film has focused on the representation of nations\, nationalism and national identities in feature films. This leaves open a wide array of underexplored research possibilities\, of which some of the most pertinent ones will be addressed in this talk. Research on the history of nationalism and film in Flanders will serve as a stepping stone to explore new research avenues. I will discuss\, among other things\, the value of integrated analyses combining the dominant method of representation analysis with production and reception analysis; the importance of a broad conception of nationalism; the notion of multiplicity\, both in terms of attention for multiple co-existing national discourses and in terms of the relations between national\, subnational and transnational discourses; the relevance of the concept of national indifference for film studies; the potential of amateur films and home movies for a bottom-up approach to nationalism research. The aim of this talk is to formulate a new research agenda for future nationalism and film studies\, thereby also touching upon possible new directions for the field of nationalism and media studies at large. \nAbout Michael \nGertjan Willems is a film and media scholar. He is assistant professor at the University of Antwerp. He is affiliated to the Research Centre for Visual Poetics (dept. of Literature) and the Visual and Digital Cultures Research Centre (dept. of Communication Sciences). He is also a guest professor at the Centre for Cinema and Media Studies at Ghent University. He has been guest lecturer or visiting scholar at the Erasmus University Rotterdam\, Saint-Louis University Brussels\, the University of Amsterdam\, the Belgian Historical Institute in Rome\, the Université Paris 2 Panthéon-Assas\, and the University of York. Since 2016\, he is chair of the Film Studies section of ECREA (European Communication Research and Education Association). \nHis research interests are aimed at a critical analysis of film and media. He has particular research expertise in media and nation-building\, Belgian film history\, film adaptations. He is the author of a Dutch-language monograph on the relation between film policy and nation-building in Flanders (2017) and editor of European Film Remakes (with Eduard Cuelenaere and Stijn Joye\, 2021) and a Dutch-language anthology on the history of media and nation-building in Flanders (with Bruno De Wever\, 2020). He published various articles in journals such as Nations and Nationalism\, Historical Journal of Film\, Radio and Television\, Journal of Belgian History and Journal of Popular Film and Television. You can find out more about Gertjan at his blog https://gertjanwillems.wordpress.com/ URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/gertjan-willems-on-nationalism-and-film-towards-a-new-research-agenda/ LOCATION:Online ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/1.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Helsinki:20220406T140000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Helsinki:20220406T153000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20220324T154652Z LAST-MODIFIED:20220325T170050Z UID:4624-1649253600-1649259000@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Athena Leoussi on Art and national modernisation DESCRIPTION:The second plenary from the joint ASEN-NISE 2022 Conference on Nationalism and Media will be broadcast live on YouTube and Facebook. \nAbstract \nThe paper discusses the contribution of European artists to the modern idea of the nation\, which transformed European societies into modern national states. It shows how artists engaged with the Enlightenment and Romanticism\, and their two distinct visions of a modern world of nations. It shows that both visions set out to revive past traditions – past golden ages: one\, the classical tradition of democratic Athens and Republican Rome\, the other rural\, communal and religious traditions. These revivals of the past became the touchstones of the national revolutions which transformed the relations between centre and periphery\, in search of political\, social\, cultural and human integration. Initially antagonistic\, the Enlightenment and Romanticism became a single vision – a single striving: the pursuit of both liberty and identity. Artists set out to articulate these visions as they collided and combined. In so doing\, they created not only icons of the modern world of nations\, but also modern forms of art. \nAbout Athena \nAthena’s research interests include\, the history\, theories and problems of nationalism and national identity; the comparative study of the peoples of Europe – their political and cultural histories and contacts; the representation of national identity in art; race\, anti-semitism and national identity in 19th-century Europe; and the role of the classical tradition in the making of modern national identities. Through her specific interest in the revival of the classical Greek body in modern Europe\, she contributed to the British Museum exhibition\, ‘Defining Beauty: The Body in Ancient Greek Art‘\, curated by Dr Ian Jenkins. \nAs Founder (1991) of the global\, Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism (ASEN)\, which she chaired for many years\, a member of ASEN’s Advisory Council\, and a Founding Editor (1994) of the international journal\, Nations and Nationalism (Wiley-Blackwell)\, which Athena continues to edit with the other members of the editorial team\, she have been involved in the development of a variety of research projects\, seminars\, conferences and colloquia on nationalism and national identity. Her research has received funding from the Greek State\, the Hellenic Foundation\, and the Irving Horowitz Foundation for Social Policy\, USA. Athena have been an assessor for the British Academy monographs section\, and for the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) and has been Visiting Senior Fellow in the Government Department\, LSE (2008-12)\, and since 2012\, she hold an International Fellowship at the Panteion University (Athens\, Greece). She is currently director of European studies at the University of Reading. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/athena-leoussi-on-nationalism-and-media/ LOCATION:Online ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/2.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Helsinki:20220405T101000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Helsinki:20220405T113000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20220324T154414Z LAST-MODIFIED:20220324T171636Z UID:4623-1649153400-1649158200@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:Michael Skey on 'Ecstatic nationalism and the media: or why nations are not really imagined communities' DESCRIPTION:The first plenary from the joint ASEN-NISE 2022 Conference on Nationalism and Media will be broadcast live on YouTube and Facebook. \nAbstract \nContra to Anderson’s seminal argument\, this paper argues that nations are not really imagined but lived\, embodied\, heard\, viewed\, represented\, materialised and felt communities. For the purposes of this session\, and to highlight the crucial role of the media in these processes\, I want to focus on the significance of ecstatic nationalism\, events designed to commemorate\, celebrate or mourn the nation. \nBuilding on Dayan & Katz’s (1992) seminal work on media events\, the paper outlines the main features of such ecstatic national events before offering a new framework for making sense of their impact\, which draws on insights from social psychology\, anthropology and media studies. In the latter case\, this includes the role of both legacy media and\, increasingly\, everyday users on digital platforms in representing both individual nations\, but also the international system\, as both natural and significant to their own lives. \nAlongside\, the everyday representation of nations\, it is argued that these events are crucial in not only mediating the nation as a more-or-less coherent entity that can be seen and heard and idealised but also in providing opportunities for collective engagement and effervescence. Put simply\, mediated representations of such events – which are difficult to escape even if you have no interest in them – offer first-hand evidence that\, for substantial numbers\, the nation still matters.  Moreover\, these processes may echo beyond the event itself into the wider routines of daily life allowing national symbols to become part of the comfortable furniture of everyday existence because their meaning and significance has been re-articulated during such periods. \nAbout Michael \nMichael jointed the Department of Social Sciences at Loughborough University in June 2016. He was previously a lecturer in media and cultural studies at University of East Anglia and has also taught sociology at UEL and University of Leicester. He was awarded his PhD by the Department of Media & Communications at the London School of Economics in October 2008. His doctoral research was funded by the AHRC and a subsequent monograph based on this work was awarded the 2012 BSA/Philip Abrams Memorial Prize. \nMichael’s research interests are in the areas of; national belonging\, globalisation\, sociology of everyday life\, media events and rituals\, mediatization\, sport and discourse theory. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/michael-skey-on-ecstatic-nationalism-and-the-media-or-why-nations-are-not-really-imagined-communities/ LOCATION:Online ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/4bis.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Helsinki:20220404T170000 DTEND;TZID=Europe/Helsinki:20220404T183000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20220224T013429Z LAST-MODIFIED:20220224T013429Z UID:4565-1649091600-1649097000@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:The Anthony D. Smith Lecture 2022: Sabina Mihelj on Platform Nations DESCRIPTION:The 2022 Anthony D. Smith Lecture will be given by Professor Sabina Mihelj of Loughborough University on the subject of ‘Platform Nations’ at 1700CET on 4th April in Lecture Hall 1 in the Meerminne building on the City Campus of University of Antwerp at Sint-Jacobstraat 2\, 2000 Antwerpen. Attendance is free and open to all; the Lecture will also be streamed online at Facebook Live and YouTube Live. \nAbstract\nWhile much has been said about the role of digital media in the proliferation of nationalism\, and especially in the resurgence of exclusionary nationalist rhetoric and sentiments\, we know much less about the nature and existence of nations in the digital world. For instance\, how do nation-states engage in nation-building in the new communication environment? How has the growing impact of digital platforms affected the way cultural institutions engage with national audiences? How and where do ordinary platform users encounter and experience nations online? To address this gap\, I introduce the concept of ‘platform nations’\, understood as imagined communities whose continued existence depends\, in part\, on the support of digital platforms. I then focus on three key mechanisms that contribute to the formation and reproduction of platform nations: the politically and commercially motivated development of national platform ecologies; copyright legislation and nation branding strategies designed to protect and promote national cultures in the online domain; and the prevailing practices and preferences among platform users. I reflect on how these mechanisms differ from those at work in pre-digital communication environments\, highlighting the influence of platform affordances and business models. I conclude with a set of methodological considerations and suggestions for empirical approaches to researching platform nations. \nAbout Prof. Mihelj\n \nProfessor Sabina Mihelj joined Loughborough University in 2004\, having previously worked and studied in Slovenia\, Hungary and Germany. Over her time at Loughborough\, Sabina served as Programme Director for both undergraduate and postgraduate degrees in communication and media studies. She is currently Director of Research for Communication and Media\, and co-led Loughborough’s REF2021 submission to the D34 panel. She is a member of the Arts and Humanities Research Council Peer Review College\, and sits on the editorial boards of several international media and cultural analysis journals. \nSabina is particularly interested in the comparative study of media cultures across both traditional and new media\, with a focus on public culture\, nationalism\, identity\, and audiences. She has written extensively on the relationship between communication\, nations and nationalism\, Cold War media and culture\, and comparative media research. Her research was funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council\, the Economic and Social Research Council\, the British Academy\, the Leverhulme Trust\, the Norwegian Research Council\, and the Ministry of Science and the Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Slovenia. \nSabina also has a track record of collaboration with non-academic stakeholders. Her research on Cold War television and everyday life has also served as a basis for several museum exhibitions in South-eastern Europe\, the UK and the US\, and a TV documentary for BBC 4. This work provided the basis for one of Loughborough’s REF Impact Case Studies\, Challenging Cold War Stereotypes. Her current work on the role of media in the rise of illiberalism in Eastern Europe\, conducted with Dr Václav Štětka\, involves collaboration with the European Broadcasting Union\, European Federation of Journalists\, and the European Platform of Regulatory Authorities. \nYou can find out more about Sabina at her profile on Loughborough University’s website or follow her on Twitter. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/the-anthony-d-smith-lecture-2022-sabina-mihelj-on-platform-nations/ ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/SmithLecture.David_.hz_.png END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20220308T160000 DTEND;TZID=UTC:20220308T173000 DTSTAMP:20260407T165951 CREATED:20220301T100535Z LAST-MODIFIED:20220301T101024Z UID:4581-1646755200-1646760600@asen.ac.uk SUMMARY:IWD2022: #BreakTheBias (in Social Science) DESCRIPTION:To mark International Women’s Day 2022\, ASEN Vice-President Daphne Halikiopoulou sits down with Petra Guasti\, Anna Triandafyllidou\, Rose de Geus\, Erin Jenne\, and Liz Carter to discuss equality in academia in general and in the social sciences in particular\, what progress has been made\, and what is still to be done to #BreakTheBias. Join us for what will be a fascinating conversation on Facebook Live or YouTube Live – members will receive an email invitation to join in on Zoom. \nAbout the panellists\nDr Elisabeth Carter is Senior Lecturer in Politics at Keele University and Research Lead in the Centre for Comparative Politics and Policy. Her research focusses on elections\, electoral systems and behaviour\, party competition\, and right-wing extremism and has written on these topics in books published by Manchester University Press\, Oxford University Press\, Routledge\, and Sage\, and in articles in the European Journal of Political Research\, the Journal of Political Ideologies\, Representation\, and West European Politics. Her PhD examined why right-wing extremist parties across Western Europe have experienced such varying levels of electoral success. She came to Keele in 2003 as a post-doctoral researcher within the Keele European Parties Research Unit (KEPRU) to work on a project on the Europeanization of national political parties before being appointed Lecturer in Politics in 2005 and Senior Lecturer in 2011\, where she has been School Research Director\, REF Lead for Politics and International Studies\, and Postgraduate Research Student Director. I was also the Associate Dean for Research in the Faculty of Humanities and Social Science from 2016 to 2018. Read more about Dr Carter at Keele. \nProf Erin Jenne is Professor of International Relations at Central European University in Vienna. She was a MacArthur Fellow at Stanford. Her first book\, Ethnic Bargaining: The Paradox of Minority Empowerment (Cornell University Press\, 2007) is the winner of Mershon Center’s Edgar S. Furniss Book Award in 2007 and was also named a Choice Outstanding Academic Title by Choice Magazine. The book is based on her dissertation\, which won the Seymour Martin Lipset Award for Best Comparativist Dissertation. She has published numerous book chapters and articles in International Studies Quarterly\, Security Studies\, Regional and Federal Studies\, Journal of Peace Research\, Civil Wars\, International Studies Review\, Research and Politics\, Journal of Democracy\, Nationalities Papers and Ethnopolitics. Read more about Prof Jenne at CEU. \nDr Rose de Geus is Lecturer in Comparative Politics at the University of Reading. Her research focusses on women in politics\, elections\, and comparative politics\, particularly women’s voting behaviour; how voters view women politicians; and why women remain under-represented in politics. She has been a postdoc fellow at the University of Toronto\, looking at Canadian elections\, and at Nuffield College\, Oxford\, where she worked with the British election study team. Read more about Dr de Geus at Reading. \nProf Anna Triandafyllidou is Canada Excellence Research Chair at Ryerson University. She is engaged into a variety of projects on migration management with a special focus on the role of migrant agency\, the interaction between different drivers of migration and the global governance of migration and asylum (including an interest in irregular migration). With regard to migrant integration\, she has a special interest in issues of identity\, diversity\, nationalism and multicultural citizenship approaches. She is also looking into the governance of cultural and religious diversity in different world regions (Europe\, Asia\, the MENA region). Last but not least she is considering migration and migrant integration in relation to the wider processes of socio-economic and geopolitical transformation that characterise the 21st century. Read more about Prof Triandafyllidou at Ryerson. \nDr Petra Guasti is Associate Professor of Democratic Theory at the Faculty of Social Sciences\, Charles University in Prague\, and a Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Sociology\, Czech Academy of Sciences. Her research focuses on the reconfiguration of the political landscape and revolves around three themes – representation\, democratization\, and populism – and has appeared in Democratic Theory\, Democratization\, Communist and Post-Communist Studies\, European Political Science\, East European Politics and Societies and Cultures\, Politics and Governance\, East European Politics\, and elsewhere. She serve as an expert for Bertelsmann Transformation Index\, Sustainable Governance Indicators (for over a decade together with Dr. Zdenka Mansfeldova)\, and V-Dem since 2018. In 2020 she was appointed to the expert board of the Nation in Transit (Freedom House). Read more about Dr Guasti at Researchgate. \nProf Daphne Halikiopoulou is Professor of Comparative Politics at the University of Reading\, Vice-President of ASEN\, and Joint Editor-in-Chief of Nations and Nationalism. She has written extensively on nationalism and the cultural and economic determinants of far-right party support. She is the author of The Golden Dawn’s ‘Nationalist Solution’: explaining the rise of the far right in Greece (with Sofia Vasilopoulou) and numerous articles on European far-right parties. Her research appears in the European Journal of Political Research\, Journal of Common Market Studies\, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies\, Government and Opposition\, European Political Science Review\, and Nations and Nationalism among others. In 2016\, Daphne was the recipient of an American Political Science Association (APSA) European Politics and Society Section Best Paper Award for my co-authored article ‘Risks\, Costs and Labour Markets: Explaining Cross-National Patterns of Far-Right Party Success in European Parliament Elections’ (with Tim Vlandas). Read more about Prof Halikiopoulou at Reading. URL:https://asen.ac.uk/event/iwd2022/ ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://asen.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/iwd.draft_.png END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR